The Future of MLK Drive: Your Questions, Answered 

by | March 3, 2021 | News | 11 comments

Last week, we began a campaign to keep Martin Luther King Jr. Drive open to people — and it’s gotten a lot of interest. Mostly positive, but some questions remain. So, we’ve put together this blog post to answer some of your questions about our proposals for the future of MLK Drive.

Let’s start with the basics. In March 2020, the economy began shutting down and motor vehicle usage saw a sharp decline. Philadelphians by and large headed out to our public spaces for some fresh air and social distancing. But there was a problem — one I experienced first hand on St. Patrick’s Day 2020, while out on a bike ride.

I rode my bike into Center City, then up Spruce Street to Schuylkill Banks to get in a relaxing ride away from motor vehicle traffic, but it only lasted a couple minutes. The Boardwalk was so crowded with people that it genuinely seemed dangerous. While we know a lot more about the safety of the outdoors as it pertains to COVID-19 these days, at the time, the recommendation was six feet of space between people, and that was not happening at all on Schuylkill Banks. There just wasn’t enough room for everyone.

So, we thought of a pretty obvious idea: How about closing the gates on MLK Drive and freeing up all that space to people, so they could maintain better social distancing and get outdoors? (Of course, at the time, we didn’t think the pandemic would last a year.) We quickly reached out to our members and supporters and gathered more than 1,000 signatures. After presenting those signatures to the City, the Kenney Administration quickly agreed that MLK Drive should be opened to people, indefinitely. It’s remained that way ever since. Now, it’s in the City’s best interest to keep it that way.

Why MLK Drive?

MLK Drive is an incredible park road on the west of the Schuylkill River with direct access to West Fairmount Park. Since the 1990s, it’s been partially closed on weekends  (between April to October) to motor vehicle traffic, but hasn’t been used to its full potential. For whatever reason, many people in the City didn’t know MLK Drive was an option, and Kelly Drive, on the west side of the Schuylkill River, remains totally packed with people. MLK Drive, notes Viren Patel of Philadelphia, is a “beautiful protected area. Best part of Philly.”

Understanding the budget constraints of Philadelphia, we asked for MLK Drive to close largely because it had the built-in infrastructure to make it happen. There are gates that block off MLK Drive to motor vehicles at all entrances and it didn’t seem like that big a deal to simply close them. And closing those gates, for thousands of people, made a world of difference.

Thousands? How do you know?

Yep, thousands! There are two ways we’ve been able to figure out the number of people using MLK per day. The first is our old-school method of counting users. On May 16th, 2020, the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia and volunteers counted the number of people using MLK Drive using our clipboard, paper and pencil method. We found a massive increase in users. Volunteers were positioned in front of the Center for Adaptive Sports at about 1.8 miles north of the Art Museum. We counted for a six hour period, between 10am and 4pm. Overall, we counted 4,400 people — or, nearly 800 users per hour, with a steady stream of traffic throughout the day.

But OK. Maybe our counters were biased. Maybe they secretly double-counted every user for bike propaganda purposes. Maybe no one actually used MLK Drive that day!

We considered these arguments. So, we partnered with engineering firm WSP, which conducted digital counts of MLK users using camera technology (which you can read more about here.) Turns out, our counters were a little off: They undercounted! WSP found more than 5,000 users per day on weekdays and more than 9,660 people on weekends. While we don’t have pre-COVID weekend counts to compare that to, we do have weekday counts, and WSP’s data, when compared to the city’s data, shows a 1,300 percent increase in users on weekdays, which is the fastest increase in trail users on any trail in the area we are aware of.

Why should MLK Drive stay open though? Can’t those people walking, rolling, biking, scooting, riding horses, and pushing strollers just go back to the sidepath when the pandemic ends?

Wait, did you say people riding horses? Of course you did! Part of what makes MLK Drive so great is that it’s wide enough to accommodate all sorts of uses.

Anyway, while we had asked the city to open MLK Drive, in part, to unload users off Kelly Drive and Schuylkill Banks, that’s not really what happened. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission electronic counts don’t show any difference in users on Kelly and Schuylkill Banks since MLK Drive was closed to motor vehicles. That means most of the 5,000 daily users on MLK are new trail users who did not use trails before! If MLK Drive opens up to motor vehicles, those new trail users will not fit on the 10’-12’ trail alongside MLK Drive. That’s why we believe this proposal is actually necessary.

“MLK drive closed to motor vehicles has been one of the greatest things about Philadelphia since the pandemic,” notes MLK Drive user Sarah Kirschbaum of Philadelphia. “It encourages outdoor activity in a safer and more enjoyable environment. Bike lanes shared with traffic are still dangerous, but MLK drive is practically danger free!”

Adds Aisha Loeks of Philadelphia: “I love walking and jogging there and having a place without traffic and car fumes to enjoy.”

Doesn’t the region need the space on MLK Drive to relieve vehicle congestion?

MLK Drive is one of the most dangerous roads in Philadelphia. It’s on the City’s high-injury network (12 percent of streets where 80 percent of deadly crashes take place) and it’s obvious why: It’s a 4-lane road without speed controls through a city park. That road was meant to be a scenic route for people traveling in motor vehicles, but sadly it has become an alternative route for people in cars to speed into and out of Center City.

Luckily, there are other express routes into Center City from the western suburbs: I-76, which is six lanes; and Kelly Drive. Our proposals for MLK Drive do not touch those routes. And they will both still be available for folks to drive in and out of the city.

Losing the space on MLK Drive likely will not make a difference. For decades, there has been a line of thinking that, if we just add one more lane, traffic will decrease. But the opposite has always been true. Expanded highways are always sold to the public as a way to decrease congestion, but increasing roadway capacity encourages more people to drive, thus failing to improve congestion. This is a concept called “Induced demand.”

The Drive has been closed for a year and city traffic is back to 80 percent of its pre-COVID capacity. This is happening while SEPTA saw a 92 percent decrease in users, from which it has not fully recovered.

While this has all happened, Carmageddon (i.e., massive car congestion) has ceased to materialize.

Eventually, people are going to get back on buses and trains as they did before COVID — and that’s what will relieve congestion on I-76 and Kelly Drive, assuming that congestion is a genuine problem.

Why are you trying to get 5,000 signatures?

To represent the 5,000 people who use the Drive every day! Plus, 5,000 is just a lot of people. If 5,000 people sign our petition before the end of the month, it will be the most signatures we’ve gathered in the shortest amount of time.

What are you going to do with those signatures?

Our plan is to deliver them to Mayor Jim Kenney, and ask him to keep MLK open to people while the city studies our proposals, traffic, usage, neighborhood support, and figures out the best possible option for the future of MLK Drive.

Isn’t this just another anti-car ploy, designed to demonize motorists?

Nope!

Got more questions about this? Send them to me! I’ll answer them. Email: Randy@BicycleCoalition.org

Interested in signing our petition? Click here and let’s get to 5,000 people.

More Content Like This

Veronica Vanterpool to Give Keynote Address

Veronica Vanterpool to Give Keynote Address

The Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia is excited to announce that Veronica Vanterpool, Deputy Administrator at the Federal Transit Administration, will give the Keynote Address at the 2023 Vision Zero PHL Conference catered luncheon. Leslie Richards, CEO and...

11 Comments
  1. WILLIAM PAUL HESS

    As a Philly resident and biker a big Thank You!

    Reply
  2. Carolyn Adams

    WE need safe walking and biking areas without cars to help us improve our health and mental well being. This petition is a key part to attain this goal.

    Reply
  3. Carl

    I enjoy riding MLK Drive but find the city’s attempts to patch the pot holes almost worse than the pot holes. The north end is the worse.

    Reply
  4. Lawrence

    Have you suggested restoring the pedestrian walkway over I-76? Seems like it’s a step back not to rebuild it.

    Reply
  5. Dennis Barnebey

    MLK has been a great success as a resource for outdoor recreation and a safe car-free zone for Phila. citizens, especially families with children. Let’s keep it. And make it even a better amenity over time.

    Reply
  6. Beth Lewis

    If, as you state, keeping this route closed to car traffic does not negatively impact congestion on the roads, or potential economic revenue to the city, I am all for it! I am a cycler and walker and feel the benefits to the lives of city dwellers and other visitors to the city over the past year have been immense and should most definitely continue.

    Reply
  7. bill weiszer

    you mention a 10-12 ft path on the mlk pathway. If you are talking about the sidewalk, try 8 ft with cracks and tree roots forcing the sidewalk to become unfriendly to many. That road does offer sideroad exists to other locations but none that cannot be reached by the other roads in the area . That roadway offers leisure and training, a person training at a higher rate of speed (no way close to a car speed though) can safely pass slower people compared to trying it on a sidewalk. A parent with multi children can more easily monitor them knowing no one will be coming directly at them as they ride. And should they decide to take a rest break, there is the entire 4 mile path, on both sides of the scenic road and the river to enjoy. I’ve seen physically limited people on that roadway, I know of NO other roadway in the Phila. area that would allow them to ride on a relatively flat/level road. I thank you for allowing me the time and space to express myself. I hope you take into account some of the other points I mentioned. Thankyou

    Reply
  8. Harvey Price

    I think it would be a good idea politically to tout the tourism aspect of having MLK Drive be open to bikes only. Imagine a tour package where you come to Philly, stay at a CC hotel, are given a bike for the weekend and spend several hours a day biking on the Drive. One works up an appetite then spends money on lunch or dinner in a local restaurant. Afterward you can walk to a local classical concert or jazz show. Think of it as Eco Tourism. Thoughts?

    Reply
  9. David Lenowitz

    Hi Randy, ss a supporter of the Coalition, and a long time bicycle commuter from Center City to Bala Cynwyd, I have taken advantage of the closure MLK drive, both before and during the pandemic. BUT, I am seriously concerned about your response to the question you pose, “Doesn’t the region need the space on MLK Drive to relieve vehicle congestion?” First, you start your answer with a reference to safety. But that’s not the question you asked. And we all know that Kelley drive is no paragon of safe travel as an alternative. Both roads are crazy dangerous for cars. More importantly, “carmageddon” wouldn’t be likely to occur if traffic has only recovered to 80% of capacity, so your argument that I76 (which can easily be a mess at 80%, and Kelley Drive (which is as hazardous as MLK), are viable alternatives is sitting on a weak foundation. I well understand “induced demand”, but we’re not discussing building new roads here. You’re suggesting, (or hoping) that closing roads will create “reduced demand”…the inverse, which is not necessarily so. On the pre-pandemic occasions when I rode the MLK bike path rather than the one on Kelley Dr. the frenzy of auto traffic suggests that there is a clearly some need for the capacity it provides. I would love to see MLK closed permanently to car traffic, I really would. But more than enough resentment exists toward bikes already, so I would like to see better arguments in support, and better alternatives for auto traffic than your post is suggesting.

    Reply
  10. Edward Jones

    I use both drives to and from center city. By far, Kelly Drive is much more dangerous with many more hard curves and cars speeding. I believe there have been many more fatalities over the years on Kelly Drive compared to MLK Drive. I-76 can be a nightmare during rush hours. Anybody who uses 76 and the Kelly Drive should agree with me. With more people going back to work and the traffic getting heavier, we need to have MLK Drive reopened to vehicle traffic.

    Reply
  11. Julia E Stone

    MLK closed to cars is a great resource for our great city.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share This